GENETIC DIVERSITY ANALYSIS OF CULTIVATED AND WILD MANGOES FROM BANGLADESH BASED ON PCR AMPLIFICATION PATTERN OF TANDEMLY ORGANIZED REPEAT SEQUENCES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71336/jabs.1246Keywords:
Mangifera indica, RepeatExplorer2, repetitive DNA, satellite DNAAbstract
Mangifera is an economically important genus mainly because of the delicious fruit produced by many species of this genus. Wild species available in Bangladesh of this genus are often misidentified and have ambiguous taxonomic leveling, due to the difficulty of getting the appropriate sample for plant identification. Tandem repeat diversity was analyzed from the Mangifera genome, to understand their impact on the genomic diversity of different species and cultivars available in Bangladesh. We use tandem repeats amplification pattern for mango diversity analysis because of the fact that satellite repeats (longer arrayed tandem repeats) are usually rapidly evolving parts of the genome, found to even diversify in closely related species, hence is useful to study genome diversity analysis. RepeatExplorer2-based bioinformatics analysis was performed to identify tandemly organized repeat sequences. Face to face PCR primers were developed from each of the consensus sequences of the identified tandem repeats sequences. Our results showed that the studied samples showed a tandem repeat-specific PCR amplification pattern that corresponds to their monomer size variation, confirming the presence of genomic organization of each repeat type. Three primer pairs targeting three tandem repeat specific clusters CL18, CL165 and CL335 showed genotype specific patterns, while CL201 and CL283 produced similar banding patterns in all the studied genotype. However, CL19 failed to follow any consistent banding pattern in all three species and cultivars except smear. Our results suggest that although cultivated M. indica genotypes are very similar in terms of tandem repeat diversity but the wild species collected from different locations of Bangladesh are indeed different. Therefore, in depth taxonomic investigation is necessary to solve the taxonomic ambiguity of wild Mangifera germplasm available in Bangladesh.
References
Dinesh, M.R., Hemanth, K.V., Ravishankar, K.V., Thangadurai, D., Narayanaswamy, P., Ali, Q., Kambiranda, D. and Basha, S.M. (2011): Mangifera. In Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources (pp. 61-74). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20447-0_4
Majumder, D.A.N., Hassan, L., Rahim, M.A. and Kabir, M.M. (2012): Genotypic and phenotypic variability in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 37(4): 683-690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v37i4.14393
Rahman, M.A. (2017). Plant diversity in Hazarikhil wildlife sanctuary of chittagong and its conservation management. Journal of Biodiversity Conservation and Bioresource Management 3(2): 43-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcbm.v3i2.36027
Uddin, M.Z. and Hassan, M.A. (2016): Plant diversity of Dhaka university campus, Bangladesh. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Science 42(1): 49-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jasbs.v42i1.31750
Ashrafuzzaman, M., Khatun, M.M., Tunazzina, N.A. and Sarwar, A.K.M.G. (2021): Conservation of minor fruit genetic resources at the Botanical Garden, Bangladesh Agricultural University. Internafional Journal of Minor Fruits Medicinal & Aromafic Plants 7:1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53552/ijmfmap.2021.v07i01.001
Sattar, M.A. (2006): Plywood. Available at www.banglapedia.org/httpdocs/HT/P_0199.HTM DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-931925
Srivastava, A.P., Chandra, R., Saxena, S., Rajan, S., Ranade, S.A. and Prasad, V. (2007): A PCR-based assessment of genetic diversity, and parentage analysis among commercial mango cultivars and hybrids. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 82(6): 951-959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2007.11512332
Nishiyama, K., Choi, Y.A., Honsho, C., Eiadthong, W. and Yonemori, K. (2006): Application of genomic in situ hybridization for phylogenetic study between Mangifera indica L. and eight wild species of Mangifera. Scientia horticulturae 110(1): 114-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.06.005
Yonemori, K., Honsho, C., Kanzaki, S., Eiadthong, W. and Sugiura, A. (2002): Phylogenetic relationships of Mangifera species revealed by ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA and a possibility of their hybrid origin. Plant Systematics and Evolution 231(1-4): 59-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s006060200011
Iquebal, M.A., Jaiswal, S., Mahato, A.K., Jayaswal, P.K., Angadi, U.B., Kumar, N., Sharma, N., Singh, A.K., Srivastav, M., Prakash, J. and Singh, S.K. (2017): MiSNPDb: a web-based genomic resources of tropical ecology fruit mango (Mangifera indica L.) for phylogeography and varietal differentiation. Scientific reports, 7(1): 14968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14998-2
Kuhn, D.N., Bally, I.S., Dillon, N.L., Innes, D., Groh, A.M., Rahaman, J., Ophir, R., Cohen, Y. and Sherman, A. (2017): Genetic map of mango: a tool for mango breeding. Frontiers in plant science 8: 577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00577
Sherman, A., Rubinstein, M., Eshed, R., Benita, M., Ish-Shalom, M., Sharabi-Schwager, M., Rozen, A., Saada, D., Cohen, Y. and Ophir, R. (2015): Mango (Mangifera indica L.) germplasm diversity based on single nucleotide polymorphisms derived from the transcriptome. BMC Plant Biology 15(1): 277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0663-6
Singh, N.K., Mahato, A.K., Jayaswal, P.K., Singh, A., Singh, S., Singh, N. and Rai, V., (2016): Origin, diversity and genome sequence of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Indian Journal of History of Science 51(2):355-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16943/ijhs/2016/v51i2.2/48449
Arumuganathan, K. and Earle, E.D. (1991): Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 9(3):208-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02672069
Sarker, B.C. and Rahim, M.A. (2012): Vegetative growth, harvesting time, yield and quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) as influenced by soil drench application of paclobutrazol. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 37(2):335-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v37i2.11238
Garrido-Ramos, M.A. (2017): Satellite DNA: an evolving topic. Genes 8(9):230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8090230
Macas, J., Novak, P., Pellicer, J., Čížková, J., Koblížková, A., Neumann, P., Fukova, I., Doležel, J., Kelly, L.J. and Leitch, I.J. (2015): In depth characterization of repetitive DNA in 23 plant genomes reveals sources of genome size variation in the legume tribe Fabeae. PLoS One 10(11): e0143424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143424
Mehrotra, S. and Goyal, V. (2014): Repetitive sequences in plant nuclear DNA: types, distribution, evolution and function. Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 12(4): 164-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2014.07.003
Schmidt, T. and Heslop-Harrison, J.S. (1998): Genomes, genes and junk: the large-scale organization of plant chromosomes. Trends in Plant Science 3(5):195-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01223-0
Heslop‐Harrison, J.S. and Schwarzacher, T., (2011): Organisation of the plant genome in chromosomes. The Plant Journal 66(1): 18-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04544.x
Kelly, L.J., Renny‐Byfield, S., Pellicer, J., Macas, J., Novák, P., Neumann, P., Lysak, M.A., Day, P.D., Berger, M., Fay, M.F. and Nichols, R.A. (2015).:Analysis of the giant genomes of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) indicates that a lack of DNA removal characterizes extreme expansions in genome size. New Phytologist 208(2): 596-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13471
Heitkam, T., Petrasch, S., Zakrzewski, F., Kögler, A., Wenke, T., Wanke, S. and Schmidt, T. (2015): Next-generation sequencing reveals differentially amplified tandem repeats as a major genome component of Northern Europe’s oldest Camellia japonica. Chromosome Research 23: 791-806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-015-9500-x
Kirov, I.V., Kiseleva, A.V., Van Laere, K., Van Roy, N. and Khrustaleva, L.I. (2017): Tandem repeats of Allium fistulosum associated with major chromosomal landmarks. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 292: 453-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-016-1286-9
Garrido-Ramos, M.A. (2015): Satellite DNA in plants: more than just rubbish. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 146(2): 153-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000437008
Plohl, M., Meštrovic, N., Mravinac, B. (2012): Satellite DNA evolution. In Repetitive DNA Genome Dynamic vol. 7, Garrido-Ramos, M.,A., Ed., Karger, Basel, pp.126–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000337122
Meštrović, N., Mravinac, B., Pavlek, M., Vojvoda-Zeljko, T., Šatović, E. and Plohl, M., (2015): Structural and functional liaisons between transposable elements and satellite DNAs. Chromosome Research 23:583-596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-015-9483-7
Macas, J., Koblížková, A., Navrátilová, A. and Neumann, P. (2009): Hypervariable 3′ UTR region of plant LTR-retrotransposons as a source of novel satellite repeats. Gene 448(2): 198-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2009.06.014
Stupar, R.M., Song, J., Tek, A.L., Cheng, Z., Dong, F. and Jiang, J., (2002): Highly condensed potato pericentromeric heterochromatin contains rDNA-related tandem repeats. Genetics 162(3): 1435-1444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/162.3.1435
del Bosque, M.E.Q., López-Flores, I., Suárez-Santiago, V.N. and Garrido-Ramos, M.A., (2014): Satellite-DNA diversification and the evolution of major lineages in Cardueae (Carduoideae Asteraceae). Journal of Plant Research 127: 575-583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-014-0648-9
Louzada, S., Lopes, M., Ferreira, D., Adega, F., Escudeiro, A., Gama-Carvalho, M. and Chaves, R. (2020): Decoding the role of satellite DNA in genome architecture and plasticity—An evolutionary and clinical affair. Genes, 11(1): 72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11010072
Wendel, J.F., Jackson, S.A., Meyers, B.C. and Wing, R.A. (2016): Evolution of plant genome architecture. Genome Biology 17:1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0908-1
Shapiro, J.A. and von Sternberg, R., (2005). Why repetitive DNA is essential to genome function. Biological Reviews 80(2): 227-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793104006657
Novák, P., Neumann, P., Pech, J., Steinhaisl, J. and Macas, J. (2013): RepeatExplorer: a Galaxy-based web server for genome-wide characterization of eukaryotic repetitive elements from next-generation sequence reads. Bioinformatics 29(6): 792-793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt054
Novák, P., Neumann, P. and Macas, J. (2020): Global analysis of repetitive DNA from unassembled sequence reads using RepeatExplorer2. Nature Protocols 15(11): 3745-3776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0400-y
Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., Buxton, S., Cooper, A., Markowitz, S., Duran, C. and Thierer, T. (2012): Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28(12): 1647-1649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L. (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12(13): 39-40.
Nagoshi, R.N. and Meagher, R.L. (2003): FR tandem-repeat sequence in fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) host strains. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 96(3): 329-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2003)096[0329:FTSIFA]2.0.CO;2
Grant, J.R., Pilotte, N. and Williams, S.A., (2019). A case for using genomics and a bioinformatics pipeline to develop sensitive and species-specific PCR-based diagnostics for soil-transmitted helminths. Frontiers in Genetics, 10:883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00883
de Boer, H., Rydmark, M.O., Verstraete, B. and Gravendeel, B., (2022). Molecular identification of plants: from sequence to species. Advanced Books, 1:e98875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/ab.e98875
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Applied Biological Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
